TBC

We are not the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, its successor Council on Vertical Urbanism, or any other official body. We are an independent editorial site that ranks buildings by where the elevator stops.Read the full disclosure.

HomeComparisonChrysler Building vs Empire State Building

Comparison · Honest Height

Chrysler Building
vs
Empire State Building

Chrysler Building

New York City · 1930

Honest height265m
Arch. top318.9m
Vanity Ratio16.9%
Floors77
Empire State Building

New York City · 1931

Honest height373.1m
Arch. top381m
Vanity Ratio2.1%
Floors102

The verdict

Empire State Building wins on honest height by 108.1 metres (373.1m vs 265m). Empire State Building also wins on Vanity Ratio: 2.1% vs 16.9%. Empire State wins both races.

The comparison

The most famous building rivalry in history: Chrysler vs Empire State. In 1930, the Chrysler Building held the world's tallest title for 11 months. When the Empire State Building opened in 1931, it took the title and never looked back. But the honest height comparison reveals something more interesting than the headline numbers: Empire State Building is not just taller by architectural top - it is dramatically more honest about its height.

Architectural top vs Honest Height

Chrysler Building - 16.9% vanity

Occupied 265mTop 318.9m

Empire State Building - 2.1% vanity

Occupied 373.1mTop 381m

Occupied height. Vanity (non-occupiable structure).Vanity Ratio explained →

The honest take

The Chrysler Building's secret weapon was its 56.6m stainless steel spire, assembled inside the building and raised through the roof at the last minute to beat 40 Wall Street. This maneuver added 53.9m of non-occupiable structure. The result is a 16.9% Vanity Ratio: every 6 metres of Chrysler you see from the street, 1 metre is decorative steel nobody stands on. Empire State Building's 2.1% ratio, achieved 14 months later by the same era of construction, shows this was a design choice, not a technical inevitability. The same 1930 New York construction environment produced both buildings. One padded its height by 16.9%. The other by 2.1%.

See also: methodology · vanity height · Honest 100

Full building profiles