TBC

We are not the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, its successor Council on Vertical Urbanism, or any other official body. We are an independent editorial site that ranks buildings by where the elevator stops.Read the full disclosure.

HomeComparisonBurj Khalifa vs Shanghai Tower

Comparison · Honest Height

Burj Khalifa
vs
Shanghai Tower

Burj Khalifa

Dubai · 2010

Honest height585.4m
Arch. top828m
Vanity Ratio29.3%
Floors163
Shanghai Tower

Shanghai · 2015

Honest height583.5m
Arch. top632m
Vanity Ratio7.7%
Floors128

The verdict

Burj Khalifa wins on honest height by 1.9m (585.4m vs 583.5m). Shanghai Tower wins on Vanity Ratio by 21.6 percentage points - 7.7% vs 29.3%.

The comparison

The world's tallest building versus the world's second-tallest by honest height. Burj Khalifa at 828m architectural top beats Shanghai Tower at 632m by 196m on the headline number. On honest height - where humans actually go - Burj Khalifa leads by less than 2 metres: 585.4m vs 583.5m. This is the tightest honest-height contest at the top of any global ranking. And Shanghai Tower nearly matches it with 21.6 percentage points less vanity.

Architectural top vs Honest Height

Burj Khalifa - 29.3% vanity

Occupied 585.4mTop 828m

Shanghai Tower - 7.7% vanity

Occupied 583.5mTop 632m

Occupied height. Vanity (non-occupiable structure).Vanity Ratio explained →

The honest take

If honest height were the global standard, Burj Khalifa would still be #1 - but only barely. The building that 'should' be #1 by architectural marketing is also legitimately the tallest building for human occupancy, just barely. Shanghai Tower is the honest runner-up: it achieves 583.5m of occupied structure in 632m of total height (7.7% vanity). Burj Khalifa achieves 585.4m in 828m (29.3% vanity). Two very different approaches to the same approximate honest-height outcome.

See also: methodology · vanity height · Honest 100

Full building profiles